Ethics of Performance Appraisals / Legally defensible Performance Appraisals
Ethics of Procedures
- Formal Standardized Performance Appraisal Systems
- Uniform to all employees, no illegal differentiations based on cast, religion etc.
- Standards formally communicated to all employees
- Freedom to review performance appraisal results
- Formal appeal process about ratings and judgments
- Written instructions and training to raters
- All personal decision makers should be aware of anti-discrimination laws.
Ethics of Contents
- Content based on job analysis
- Traits based appraisals should be avoided
- Objectively verifiable data should be used
- Constraints on performance beyond control should be prevented
- Specific job related dimensions to be used rather than single or global dimensions.
- Dimensions must be assigned weight to reflect relative importance in performance score
Ethics of Documentation of Results
- A thoroughly written record of evidence leading to termination should be maintained
- Written documentation of extreme ratings should be maintained
- Documentation should be consistent among the raters.
Ethics of Raters
- The raters should be trained in how to use an appraisal system
- The rater must have opportunity to observe ratees first hand and review important ratee performance products.
- Use of more than one rater is desirable to reduce biases.
3 Comments